IDENTILIN$$  F141C10|HuntMan|Oldisworth vol.\pp. 172-75\T:EWS\o\E:JSC\hwt\1-31-95\P:EWS\o(KeynesB.4.8)\7-4-95;5-31-01
141.C10.HE1  %X%1To the Countesse of Huntingdon%2. /%X90.
141.C10.001om
141.C10.002om
141.C10.003om
141.C10.004om
141.C10.005om
141.C10.006om
141.C10.007om
141.C10.008om
141.C10.009om
141.C10.010om
141.C10.011om
141.C10.012om
141.C10.013om
141.C10.014om
141.C10.015om
141.C10.016  May apt soules, (and the worst may) vertue know.
141.C10.017om
141.C10.018om
141.C10.019om
141.C10.020om
141.C10.021om
141.C10.022om
141.C10.023om
141.C10.024om
141.C10.025om
141.C10.026om
141.C10.027om
141.C10.028om
141.C10.029om
141.C10.030om
141.C10.031om
141.C10.032om
141.C10.033om
141.C10.034om
141.C10.035om
141.C10.036om
141.C10.037om
141.C10.038om
141.C10.039om
141.C10.040om
141.C10.041om
141.C10.042om
141.C10.043om
141.C10.044om
141.C10.045om
141.C10.046om
141.C10.047  I, which doe so, as your true subject, owe
141.C10.048om
141.C10.049om
141.C10.050om
141.C10.051  If they were so, oft, flatteries worke as[see_notes] farre,
141.C10.052om
141.C10.053om
141.C10.054om
141.C10.055om
141.C10.056om
141.C10.057om
141.C10.058om
141.C10.059om
141.C10.060om
141.C10.061om
141.C10.062om
141.C10.063om
141.C10.064om
141.C10.065om
141.C10.066om
141.C10.067om
141.C10.068om
141.C10.069om
141.C10.070om
141.C10.0SSom
141.C10.0$$  %1Ms. emends only, in copy of C, given in context of C's whole line: "90." added under HE; 
parens in l.16; comma after "subject" in l.47; l.51: s in "as" didn't print in C10 copy, but is entered by 
hand; many lines manually underlined; marginal commentary/glosses: l.1, LM: "S%5r%6 T. O wifes"[sic]; l.31, 
LM: "God Incarnate [Greek_Chi]%5t%6" (it could be argued that the "t" is a Greek tau--much the same -JSC)%2