IDENTILIN$$ F141C10|HuntMan|Oldisworth vol.\pp. 172-75\T:EWS\o\E:JSC\hwt\1-31-95\P:EWS\o(KeynesB.4.8)\7-4-95;5-31-01 141.C10.HE1 %X%1To the Countesse of Huntingdon%2. /%X90. 141.C10.001om 141.C10.002om 141.C10.003om 141.C10.004om 141.C10.005om 141.C10.006om 141.C10.007om 141.C10.008om 141.C10.009om 141.C10.010om 141.C10.011om 141.C10.012om 141.C10.013om 141.C10.014om 141.C10.015om 141.C10.016 May apt soules, (and the worst may) vertue know. 141.C10.017om 141.C10.018om 141.C10.019om 141.C10.020om 141.C10.021om 141.C10.022om 141.C10.023om 141.C10.024om 141.C10.025om 141.C10.026om 141.C10.027om 141.C10.028om 141.C10.029om 141.C10.030om 141.C10.031om 141.C10.032om 141.C10.033om 141.C10.034om 141.C10.035om 141.C10.036om 141.C10.037om 141.C10.038om 141.C10.039om 141.C10.040om 141.C10.041om 141.C10.042om 141.C10.043om 141.C10.044om 141.C10.045om 141.C10.046om 141.C10.047 I, which doe so, as your true subject, owe 141.C10.048om 141.C10.049om 141.C10.050om 141.C10.051 If they were so, oft, flatteries worke as[see_notes] farre, 141.C10.052om 141.C10.053om 141.C10.054om 141.C10.055om 141.C10.056om 141.C10.057om 141.C10.058om 141.C10.059om 141.C10.060om 141.C10.061om 141.C10.062om 141.C10.063om 141.C10.064om 141.C10.065om 141.C10.066om 141.C10.067om 141.C10.068om 141.C10.069om 141.C10.070om 141.C10.0SSom 141.C10.0$$ %1Ms. emends only, in copy of C, given in context of C's whole line: "90." added under HE; parens in l.16; comma after "subject" in l.47; l.51: s in "as" didn't print in C10 copy, but is entered by hand; many lines manually underlined; marginal commentary/glosses: l.1, LM: "S%5r%6 T. O wifes"[sic]; l.31, LM: "God Incarnate [Greek_Chi]%5t%6" (it could be argued that the "t" is a Greek tau--much the same -JSC)%2